Friday, May 4, 2012

The Dictators Of The Democracy


Corruption’ is the word which has become synonym to the present parliamentary system. But the problem is none of the party wants to accept their responsibilities towards the voter of this country.  If a Yoga Guru or a civil society members call MPs Corrupt, murderers, dacoits than the whole Parliament erupts and shows their discomfort towards the statement unanimously, which is a good sign of unity amongst the parliamentarians, but where this unity goes when farmers commit suicides in vidharbha?  or Terrorist like Kasab and Afjal guru still alive when we all know and its been proven by the Court what sin they have done.

Technically MPs and others sects of society should not have conflicts amongst themselves as it’s a relationship like body and its part. But in present scenario the situation has become very sad, anyone who has ambition is commenting on politicians he/she feels like. We are not the supporter of that guy who slapped Sharad Pawar we totally condemn this act, but our question is why such situations occurring? Who is responsible? Especially when we know our Parliament represents constitutionally the thinking of people of this country and Parliament is also a Mirror and voice of the Nation. Question is when people like Ram Dev or Anna Hazare talk about corruption then definitely they will blame someone for this, so what if they say it’s the parliamentarians who are responsible for it. In a situation like this, MPs should speak to these leaders of the civil society directly and ask them what is their problem? And why can’t you guys allow us to work towards the cure of it? Especially when our constitution says that it’s the duty of the Parliament to render their services towards the common people of this country according to his choice and ambition.

Parliament is being represented by its MPs and their duty is to put forward the demand and questions of the people who have elected MPs to represent them in the Parliament. And if civil society members raise their voice against the MPs and parliamentary system than MPs should bow to the demands of the public and try to rectify the problem instead of condemning civilians. After all this is the only right which common men have in the system of democracy“freedom of speech”.

Corruption was then also when we’ve got our independence in Nehru, Indira regime and one of the prime reasons of JP movement in the mid 70s was corruption only. Present situation is more or less the same. The only difference is time; in 70s the medium of spreading awareness was very less in comparison to present time. And also people in urban society have become more aware because many mediums of information dissemination have come up now. Amongst all the medium Internet has become strongest medium. And that is one of the reasons why MPs on the UPA side wants to curtail the power of social media. Very recent example was Abhshek Manu Singhvi’s incident, no news channels or Newspapers have covered this incident as media was managed well by the culprit side. But still many people have seen that CD on the social site  

Baba Ramdev’s comment on Parliament and its members could not be supported but kindly understand the situation of common man  inflation and corruption has killed the moral values of the society, now common man has started thinking only about Me, Myself and I. if you(MPs) really want population or masses to behave properly then you are the only one who have to take initiative, otherwise more and more commoners will come up and perform activities which are neither good for themselves, society or for the Country and its Parliamentary system. The new dawn has arrived kindly get up everybody otherwise it will be too late. 

Parliament is the most auspicious place in the democratic structure of a country, one has to respect it, if we believe in Democratic system but that applies for both parties.   

No comments:

Post a Comment